Kemeny ranking aggregation meets the GPU
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Ranking aggregation, studied in the field of social choice theory, focuses on combination information with aim determining a winning ranking among some alternatives when preferences voters are expressed by ordering possible from most to least preferred. One famous aggregation methods can be traced back 1959, Kemeny introduces measure distance between and opinion gathered profile rankings. Using this, he proposed elect as election one that minimizes profile. This is factorial number alternatives, posing handicap runtime algorithms developed find ranking, which prevents its use real problems where large. In this work we introduce first algorithm for problem designed executed Graphical Processing Unit. The threads identifiers codified associated rankings means system, radix numeral system then used uniquely pair thread using Lehmer’s code. Results guarantee constant execution time up 14 alternatives.
منابع مشابه
Aggregation of Partial Rankings - An Approach Based on the Kemeny Ranking Problem
Aggregating the preference of multiple experts is a very old problem which remains without an absolute solution. This assertion is supported by the Arrow’s theorem: there is no aggregation method that simultaneously satisfies three fairness criteria (non-dictatorship, independence of irrelevant alternatives and Pareto efficiency). However, it is possible to find a solution having minimal distan...
متن کاملExperiments with Kemeny ranking: What works when?
This paper performs a comparison of several methods for Kemeny rank aggregation (104 algorithms and combinations thereof in total) originating in social choice theory, machine learning, and theoretical computer science, with the goal of establishing the best trade-offs between search time and performance. We find that, for this theoretically NP-hard task, in practice the problems span three reg...
متن کاملParameterized Complexity Results for the Kemeny Rule in Judgment Aggregation
We investigate the parameterized complexity of computing an outcome of the Kemeny rule in judgment aggregation, providing the first parameterized complexity results for this problem for any judgment aggregation procedure. As parameters, we consider (i) the number of issues, (ii) the maximum size of formulas used to represent issues, (iii) the size of the integrity constraint used to restrict th...
متن کاملA Computational Study of the Kemeny Rule for Preference Aggregation
We consider from a computational perspective the problem of how to aggregate the ranking preferences of a number of alternatives by a number of different voters into a single consensus ranking, following the majority voting rule. Social welfare functions for aggregating preferences in this way have been widely studied since the time of Condorcet (1785). One drawback of majority voting procedure...
متن کاملLehrer Meets Ranking Theory
Meets what? Ranking theory is, as far as I know, the only existing theory suited for underpinning Keith Lehrer’s account of knowledge and justification. If this is true, it’s high time to bring both together. This is what I shall do in this paper. However, the result of defining Lehrer’s primitive notions in terms of ranking theory will be disappointing: justified acceptance will, depending on ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Supercomputing
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0920-8542', '1573-0484']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05058-w